The US Supreme Courtroom rejects Stormy Daniels’ enchantment and ends libel go well with in opposition to Trump
The US Supreme Court has just dismissed the defamation lawsuit that Stormy Daniels brought against former President Donald Trump.
Earlier this week, the US Supreme Court announced that it will not hear Stormy Daniels’ appeal over the defamation lawsuit against former President Donald Trump. Daniels first filed the lawsuit in federal court in California, alleging the former president defamed her in a 2018 tweet questioning her story about a man threatening her in a parking lot with her young daughter She went public with her claims that she had a sexual affair with Trump in 2006, an affair Trump denies. “
US Supreme Court building; Image by Mark Thomas via Pixabay.com.
According to Daniels, a man came up to her and said, “Leave Trump alone. Forget the story. “The man also allegedly threatened bad things would happen to her if she decided to continue the story. Then, in January 2018, the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump “was involved in reaching a substantial hush-money and confidentiality agreement with Daniels just weeks before the 2016 election.”
In response to the report, Trump tweeted on April 18, 2018: “A sketch years later about a nonexistent man. A total scam to play the Fake News Media for Fools (but they know it)! “He also suggested that” the man Daniels said threatened her might actually have been her ex-husband. “
Eventually, Daniel’s lawsuit was dismissed by a U.S. district court and then moved on to a three-judge panel of the 9th Court of Appeals, which eventually joined the former president. The court thus rejected “Daniel’s appeal against the dismissal in July 2020”. The panel ruled that Trump’s 2018 tweet was “an expression of opinion based on another user’s tweet and not defamatory.” From there, Daniels appealed to the Supreme Court in October 2020.
The statement from the 9th Circuit Panel states:
“From the point of view of an objectively sane reader, the tweet here reflects Mr Trump’s opinion on the ramifications of the supposedly similar appearances of Ms. Clifford’s ex-husband and the man in the sketch.”
The panel also found that “expressions of opinion cannot form the basis of a defamation lawsuit”. She also denied claims that “Trump’s reference to a” total con job “was to accuse her of criminal fraud.” It goes on to say:
“It would be clear to a reasonable reader that the tweet did not accuse Clifford of actual criminal activity. Instead, the term ‘con job’ as used in this context could only be interpreted as a colorful expression of rhetorical exaggeration. ”
The Supreme Court declined to hear Stormy Daniel’s appeal in her libel suit against Trump
The Supreme Court rejects Stormy Daniel’s libel suit against Trump